If you sell online to customers in Europe, or process cards through a European acquirer, PSD2 and SCA aren’t optional. They’re a regulatory requirement. Non-compliance means declined transactions, lost revenue, and awkward conversations with your payment provider. This guide explains both in plain language, tells you what actually applies to your business, and shows you how to stay compliant without tanking your conversion rate. PSD2 is the law that applies today, and it is already being replaced. This guide covers PSD2 and SCA as they work right now, then what the incoming PSD3 and Payment Services Regulation change, and when.
SCA needs two of three factors from different categories. Knowledge, possession, inherence. It applies when both the issuing and acquiring bank sit in the EEA or UK, and the UK kept the rules after Brexit.
3DS2 does the work, and it is often invisible. Modern frictionless flow authenticates most legitimate payments silently. The visible challenge only fires when the bank’s risk engine wants more confidence.
Only the first recurring payment needs SCA. Subsequent charges are merchant-initiated and exempt, but only if that first transaction was set up correctly.
Authentication shifts fraud liability to the issuer. That is the buried upside: on authenticated payments, the bank absorbs true-fraud chargebacks, not you.
PSD3 is coming, but it is not here yet. A successor package, PSD3 and the Payment Services Regulation, has been agreed in Brussels but is not in force. SCA under PSD2 is still the live requirement, and PSD3 is set to tighten it, not loosen it.
What Is PSD2?
PSD2 stands for the Payment Services Directive 2, a European Union law that came into force in January 2018. It updated the original 2007 Payments Directive to reflect how dramatically payments had changed in the decade since.
The law has two main goals. First, making payments more secure. Second, opening up the banking system so that third-party apps can access payment data, but only with your customer’s explicit permission. For most merchants the security side is what matters. Specifically, the Strong Customer Authentication rules.
Worth flagging early: the UK kept PSD2 rules after Brexit and enforces them independently. If you sell to UK customers, the same SCA requirements apply there as in the EU.
What Is SCA?
SCA stands for Strong Customer Authentication. It’s the specific security requirement inside PSD2 that forces banks to verify who a customer is before approving certain payments.
The problem it’s solving is this. Before PSD2, a customer could complete a card payment by entering their card number, expiry date, and CVV. Three pieces of information that can all be stolen in a single data breach. SCA requires the bank to verify identity using at least two of the following three factors:
The Three Authentication Factors
Knowledge
Something you know
Password or PIN
Possession
Something you have
Your phone or token
Inherence
Something you are
Face ID or fingerprint
Any two of the three factors must be used, and they must come from different categories. Compromising one cannot make the other easier to compromise.
The factors have to come from different categories. A password and a security question don’t count as two factors because both are “something you know.” In practice this almost always means a PIN or password combined with your phone (push notification or one-time code) or a biometric like Face ID.
What Does the Checkout Flow Actually Look Like?
The most common way SCA shows up at checkout is through 3D Secure 2 (3DS2), the authentication layer that sits between your payment form and the card issuer. Here’s what the customer experience looks like before and after:
Checkout Flow: Before vs. After SCA
Before SCA
After SCA
That said, the extra step doesn’t always appear. Modern 3DS2 can authenticate customers silently in the background using device data and browsing signals, with no interruption to the checkout at all. This is called a frictionless flow. The visible challenge only fires when the bank’s risk engine decides it needs more confidence. For legitimate transactions on recognised devices, most will go through frictionlessly.
Who Does SCA Apply To?
SCA applies to online card payments where both the issuing bank (your customer’s bank) and the acquiring bank (your processor’s bank) are in the European Economic Area or the UK. If either bank is outside that zone, SCA is technically out of scope, though it’s still good practice to support 3DS2 regardless.
Practically: if you’re selling to European or UK customers and processing through a European acquirer, SCA applies. That includes merchants based outside Europe who sell into these markets.
What About Subscriptions and Recurring Payments?
This catches a lot of merchants out. The rule is simpler than it sounds:
- The first payment in a recurring series requires SCA. It’s customer-initiated and must be authenticated.
- Subsequent recurring charges are merchant-initiated transactions (MITs) and are generally exempt from SCA, provided the first transaction was properly authenticated and the recurring agreement was set up correctly.
- Free trials converting to paid: SCA is required at the point of the first actual charge, even if that’s days after sign-up.
The setup of that first transaction matters a lot. Cut corners there and you’ll see problems on every charge that follows.
SCA Exemptions: When You Can Skip Authentication
SCA isn’t required on every transaction. There are defined exemptions where the regulation permits the bank to skip authentication. Understanding these is how you protect conversion without cutting compliance corners.
| Exemption | When it applies | Who requests it |
|---|---|---|
| Low-value transactions | Payments under €30 (or £25 in the UK), unless the customer has exceeded 5 consecutive exempt transactions or €100 cumulative since last SCA | Acquirer or issuer |
| Trusted merchant / whitelisting | Customer has added the merchant to their bank’s trusted list | Issuer (customer must initiate) |
| Recurring payments of fixed amounts | Same amount to same merchant, after the initial authenticated transaction | Merchant / acquirer |
| Merchant-initiated transactions | Charges made without the customer present (e.g. subscription renewals, metered billing) | Merchant |
| Low-risk transaction (TRA) | Transaction Risk Analysis: PSP’s fraud rate is below threshold and transaction risk score is low | Acquirer or issuer |
| Corporate payments | Business-to-business payments via lodge cards or central travel accounts | Acquirer |
Exemptions are requests, not guarantees; the issuer always has the final say.
One thing to be clear on: exemptions are requests, not guarantees. The issuing bank always has the final say and can require authentication regardless. And if a transaction goes through under an exemption and turns out to be fraudulent, the liability sits with whoever requested the exemption, usually the acquirer or the merchant, not the bank.
What Happens If You Ignore SCA?
No warning, just a failed payment
Non-compliance has direct commercial consequences. If your checkout doesn’t support 3DS2, issuing banks will decline transactions that should have been authenticated. There’s no warning, no fine, just a failed payment that shows up in your gateway dashboard. The customer sees a declined card and usually doesn’t try again.
The practical risks:
- Declined transactions: Banks decline SCA-required payments that haven’t been authenticated.
- Processor problems: Your payment processor may flag you for non-compliance or add conditions to your account.
- Chargeback exposure: Authenticated transactions shift fraud liability to the issuer. Unauthenticated ones leave you holding it.
- Regulatory risk: PSPs in Europe are supervised by national regulators and are required to enforce SCA with their merchants.
How to Implement SCA Without Hurting Conversion
The fear is understandable. Add an authentication step and customers drop off. That fear is based on real experience with early 3DS1 implementations, which were genuinely bad. But 3DS2 is a different thing when it’s done properly.
Step 1: Use a Payment Provider That Handles 3DS2 Natively
The simplest path is to use a gateway or PSP (Stripe, Adyen, Braintree, Checkout.com, Mollie and others) that handles 3DS2 authentication as part of their standard payment flow. They manage the challenge, the frictionless flow logic, and the liability rules. You don’t need to build anything. You just need to confirm you’re on their 3DS-enabled integration, which for most providers is now the default.
Step 2: Optimise for Frictionless Flow
Frictionless flow happens when the bank’s risk engine is confident enough to approve without challenging the customer. You can improve your frictionless rate by doing a few things:
- Pass rich transaction data through your 3DS2 integration: device fingerprint, billing address, email, phone number, order history. More data means lower perceived risk.
- Use a gateway with a strong fraud model. Their risk scoring directly affects how often your transactions get challenged.
- Encourage customers to save their card. Saved cards on recognised devices authenticate frictionlessly far more often.
- Encourage customers to whitelist you with their bank. This is a longer-term play but it compounds over time.
Step 3: Handle the Challenge Flow Gracefully
When a challenge does appear, how you handle it determines whether the customer completes it or leaves. A few things that matter:
- Show a clear message explaining what’s happening and why. Customers who understand the security check are much less likely to abandon.
- Make sure the 3DS challenge renders properly on mobile. Most failures happen on small screens where the bank’s iframe breaks the layout.
- Test with real cards across different European banks. Implementation quality varies a lot between issuers.
- Track your authentication rate alongside conversion. If authentication success starts dropping, your gateway or acquirer can usually help diagnose it.
Step 4: Set Up Recurring Billing Correctly From Day One
If you run subscriptions or any recurring billing model, the setup of the first transaction has a big knock-on effect. When that first payment is authenticated:
- Make sure the recurring billing agreement is flagged in the 3DS2 authentication request.
- Store the network transaction ID from the initial authenticated charge. This is what your gateway uses to mark subsequent charges as merchant-initiated.
- Work with your PSP to ensure all recurring charges reference the original authenticated transaction. If that chain breaks, banks may start declining renewals.
The Chargeback Benefit
There’s one advantage of SCA that tends to get buried under all the compliance talk: liability shift. When a transaction is authenticated via 3DS2, fraud liability moves from you to the card issuer. If that transaction later turns out to be fraudulent, the bank absorbs the loss, not you. For merchants in high-risk categories where fraud chargebacks are a real cost line, that’s worth taking seriously.
Authenticate the payment and true-fraud liability moves to the issuer. The bank absorbs the loss, not you.
The Payments Edge
It won’t help with friendly fraud, where a genuine customer disputes a transaction they actually made. But it does give you solid protection against true fraud chargebacks on authenticated payments.
From PSD2 to PSD3 and the PSR
PSD2 is not the last word. In June 2023 the European Commission proposed to replace it with a two part package: a third Payment Services Directive (PSD3) and, for the first time, a directly applicable Payment Services Regulation (PSR). The split matters. PSD3 covers licensing and supervision of payment firms and still has to be written into each country’s national law, while the PSR carries the conduct rules that touch your checkout, SCA, fraud liability and open banking, and applies the same way in every member state without national interpretation.
The reason for putting the conduct rules in a regulation is consistency. Under PSD2, member states transposed the same directive in slightly different ways, which is part of why SCA rollouts and exemption handling varied across Europe. A regulation removes most of that room to diverge.
Where the legislation actually stands
This is the part most write ups get wrong, so to be precise: as of July 2026 PSD3 and the PSR are agreed but not yet law. Parliament and Council reached a provisional political agreement in late 2025 and a committee approved the text in May 2026, but both institutions still have to hold their formal votes, and nothing has been published in the Official Journal. Until that happens, PSD2 and its SCA rules apply in full.
- 28 Jun 2023
Commission proposes the package
The EU executive publishes PSD3 and the PSR to replace PSD2.
- 23 Apr 2024
Parliament sets its position
MEPs adopt their first reading negotiating text.
- 27 Nov 2025
Provisional agreement
Parliament and Council settle the text in trilogue negotiations.
- 5 May 2026
Committee sign off
The Parliament’s economic affairs committee approves the agreed text.
- NextPending
Formal adoption, then entry into force
Parliament and Council must formally vote the text and publish it before it becomes law. It is not in force yet.
Once adopted, the two instruments arrive on different clocks. The PSR is a regulation, so it starts to apply a set period after it is published. PSD3 is a directive, so member states get a transposition window to write it into national law first. In practice that pushes the parts merchants feel into roughly 2027 and beyond, not overnight.
What changes for merchants
- SCA stays, and tightens. Strong Customer Authentication is not going away. The package keeps the framework and refines it, including making authentication more accessible for customers without a smartphone. The direction of travel is more rigour, not less, so an SCA setup you build correctly today carries forward.
- More fraud liability moves toward providers. The rules push banks and payment firms to do more on fraud, including extending checks that match a payee name to the account number, and addressing impersonation scams where a customer is tricked into authorising a payment. For merchants this reinforces the value of authenticated flows.
- Open banking gets sturdier. Licensed third parties get more reliable data access, and customers get permission dashboards to see and revoke who can reach their account data. If account to account payments are on your roadmap, this is the groundwork.
- Recurring and merchant initiated rules carry over. The MIT framework that lets subscriptions charge a stored card without challenging the customer every cycle continues. Moving it into a regulation should make exemption handling more consistent across the EEA.
Nothing to comply with yet, but build for the direction
There is no PSD3 checklist to action today. The one thing worth doing now is getting your PSD2 SCA implementation right, because every signal from the agreed text points to tighter authentication and more fraud liability on providers, not a relaxation you could wait out.
Quick Reference: SCA at a Glance
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What is SCA? | A mandatory security check requiring two-factor authentication for online payments in Europe and the UK |
| Who does it affect? | Any merchant processing card payments where both the issuing and acquiring bank are in the EEA or UK |
| How is it implemented? | Via 3D Secure 2 (3DS2), handled by your payment gateway or PSP |
| Do all transactions need it? | No. Several exemptions exist including low-value transactions, recurring charges, and TRA |
| What happens without it? | Issuing banks decline transactions that should have been authenticated |
| Does it affect subscriptions? | Only the first payment needs SCA. Subsequent merchant-initiated charges are exempt |
| What about fraud chargebacks? | Successfully authenticated transactions shift fraud liability from merchant to issuer |
- EUR-Lex, “Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (PSD2),” eur-lex.europa.eu.
- European Banking Authority, “Payment services and electronic money (SCA / RTS),” eba.europa.eu.
- European Commission, “Modernising payment services and opening financial services data: new opportunities for consumers and businesses,” press release, 28 June 2023, ec.europa.eu.
- European Parliament, Legislative Observatory, “Payment services and electronic money services in the internal market (PSD3), 2023/0209(COD),” oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu.
- European Parliament, Legislative Observatory, “Payment services in the internal market (PSR), 2023/0210(COD),” oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu.
- European Parliament, Legislative Train Schedule, “Revision of EU rules on payment services (state of play),” europarl.europa.eu.
