The Wire

FCA Censures CACEIS UK Over Weak Financial Crime Controls: The Monitoring Lesson for Acquirers

An asset bank checked the register three times, saw the red flag, and opened the accounts anyway. The FCA just put a 31.7m pound price on ignoring your own alerts.

FCA Censures CACEIS UK Over Weak Financial Crime Controls: The Monitoring Lesson for Acquirers

The Financial Conduct Authority censured CACEIS UK on 25 June 2026 and secured a 31,714,068 pound voluntary payment for clients of the collapsed wealth manager WealthTek, after the asset servicing bank failed to act on clear signs of financial crime risk. Notably, the FCA imposed no fine, crediting the firm’s co-operation and payment. The penalty would otherwise have been 23,091,000 pounds after a settlement discount.

The failure was inaction on checks it already ran

What sank CACEIS UK was not a missing check. On three separate occasions the bank looked up WealthTek on the Financial Services Register and saw the firm was not authorised to hold certain client assets. It also missed that WealthTek could not hold client money at all. It opened the accounts anyway, then failed to promptly review and resolve the alerts its own systems raised.

31.7m pounds
Voluntary payment to clients
23.09m pounds
Fine avoided via co-operation
57m pounds
Total recovered for WealthTek clients
13 months
FCA investigation length
Why it matters for acquirers and PSPs. Onboarding is not where most financial crime exposure lives. The lookup that flags a problem is worthless if no one acts on it, and an unresolved monitoring alert is a live liability, not a queue item. The lesson for anyone underwriting high-risk merchants: reviewing the register once at signup proves nothing. What regulators test is whether you act on red flags after the account goes live, and whether alerts get worked to resolution rather than aging in a backlog.

The FCA closed the investigation in 13 months and has now recovered over 57m pounds for WealthTek clients across actions against CACEIS UK, Sapia Partners and Barclays Bank UK. “Strong financial crime controls keep clients’ assets safe,” said Therese Chambers, the FCA’s joint executive director of enforcement. “CACEIS UK’s failures exposed clients to serious risk.”

For merchant acquirers, the read-across is direct. The same pattern, a flag surfaced and then ignored, is exactly how transaction laundering and AML exposure builds inside a live portfolio. Merchant underwriting that ends at approval, rather than continuing as ongoing monitoring, is the gap this case puts a price on.

    Sources
  1. Financial Conduct Authority, “CACEIS UK censured and to pay 31.7m pounds to WealthTek clients for weak financial crime controls,” Press Releases, 25 June 2026.
Go deeper
The evergreen analysis behind this story
High-Risk Merchants · Analysis
Off the MATCH List: How Merchants Actually Get Removed
Landing on Mastercard's MATCH list is easy. Getting off is not: only your acquirer can remove you, and the clock runs five years.
Compliance · Guide
PSD2, SCA and PSD3: A Plain English Overview
Strong Customer Authentication can wreck your conversion if you implement it blindly. Here is what SCA means for checkout, who it hits, and how…